Post by Joenmb on Jun 16, 2015 18:21:33 GMT 1
The following policy replaces the old policy and the main change concerns non-admins inputting on admin applications (rule 4) but there are other minor changes for all such as offering better clarify on how to object.
1. When admins respond to an admin application, there are only 4 valid responses:
a. Vouch (with or without justification) and the justification should be factual (e.g. the applicant is always helpful in identifying griefers, the applicant help others, etc.). Alternatively, you can also vouch by upvoting (thumbs up) any other vouch that you agree with - this will reduce clutter on the thread.
b. Object and the justification should be factual (e.g. the applicant is too inexperienced, the applicant doesn't meet time requirements, the applicant is a griefer, etc.). Using dramatic terms like "strongly object" should be avoided unless you have 'strong' reasons that are stated (e.g. the applicant DDOS'd). If you object and provide no reason, it will be of little consideration - better to up vote an objection that includes reasons you agree with. Also, objections that are based on the distant past should be avoided in favor of how the admin is performing currently. Last, do not use object in cases where you don't know or haven't seen the applicant online - that is what neutral is for.
c. Neutral. If you can't vouch or object. Normally used when you don't know the applicant at all or well enough to make a decision. Also, neutral is just that; don't use contradictory terminology like neutral leaning to object / vouch; if you're learning, use object or vouch. Again, to avoid clutter and echoing, you can simply up vote any neutral comment that you agree with.
d. Ignore the application (i.e. do input or reply). This is a case where you might have a conflict of interest such as you're competing for the same promotion.
Note: An admin is allowed to change their vouch to an objection or vice-versa, or from neutral to vouch/object HOWEVER you must edit the original vote post and change it; do NOT add a new post with different or same vote. Once the application is approved or disapproved, you may not object or vouch.
2. Keep it professional - do not engage in name-calling, insults, personal attacks, bullying, and do not add images (funny or otherwise). If not, your message is subject to removal and your input will not count. Also, if you object, make every attempt to be positive and constructive in your objection. For example, instead of saying, "he's clueless", say, "you need to learn the plugin commands." Do not use the application threads to bully or haze the applicants. This instruction will be monitored closely to ensure compliance.
3. Any admin of any rank can vouch or object as long as they can view the application. For example, a Telnet admin can vouch or object on a senior admin application however it won't carry the same weight as a senior admin.
4. A non-admin (OP) is not allowed comment on an admin application except to offer congratulation if the application is approved (rule 9). However, an OP can PM myself or the Executive Admins if they have specific information about the applicant that we should consider. For example, they have evidence that the applicant DDOS'd a server or the applicant was exceptionally helpful to them, etc.
5. For admin reinstatement applications, there is no need to vouch or object because they will be automatically approved unless the admin was removed for mis-conduct, However if an admin does wish to object, send a PM to the Executive Admin and owner with justification.
6. Admins will not question (or comment about) other admin vouches/objections however they can flag or send a PM to the admin, executive admin, or myself.
7. Do not use comments to suggest approval or disapproval; that's the job of the executive admin or owner. For example, don't state "auto-disapproved due to not meeting time requirements" - use "object - doesn't meet time requirements" instead.
8. If an applicant violates the rules during the application process, leave it to a senior admin, executive admin, or owner to make the correction.
9. Until the application is approved or disapproved, don't make any other comments except under rule 1 above. If the application is approved, you're allowed to make congratulatory comments including images but don't make comments to suggest the approval is wrong (use PM if needed). If an application is disapproved, it will normally be locked to prevent further comments.
10. If you are applying for an admin promotion, you may not vote or comment on another admin that is applying for the same position.
1. When admins respond to an admin application, there are only 4 valid responses:
a. Vouch (with or without justification) and the justification should be factual (e.g. the applicant is always helpful in identifying griefers, the applicant help others, etc.). Alternatively, you can also vouch by upvoting (thumbs up) any other vouch that you agree with - this will reduce clutter on the thread.
b. Object and the justification should be factual (e.g. the applicant is too inexperienced, the applicant doesn't meet time requirements, the applicant is a griefer, etc.). Using dramatic terms like "strongly object" should be avoided unless you have 'strong' reasons that are stated (e.g. the applicant DDOS'd). If you object and provide no reason, it will be of little consideration - better to up vote an objection that includes reasons you agree with. Also, objections that are based on the distant past should be avoided in favor of how the admin is performing currently. Last, do not use object in cases where you don't know or haven't seen the applicant online - that is what neutral is for.
c. Neutral. If you can't vouch or object. Normally used when you don't know the applicant at all or well enough to make a decision. Also, neutral is just that; don't use contradictory terminology like neutral leaning to object / vouch; if you're learning, use object or vouch. Again, to avoid clutter and echoing, you can simply up vote any neutral comment that you agree with.
d. Ignore the application (i.e. do input or reply). This is a case where you might have a conflict of interest such as you're competing for the same promotion.
Note: An admin is allowed to change their vouch to an objection or vice-versa, or from neutral to vouch/object HOWEVER you must edit the original vote post and change it; do NOT add a new post with different or same vote. Once the application is approved or disapproved, you may not object or vouch.
2. Keep it professional - do not engage in name-calling, insults, personal attacks, bullying, and do not add images (funny or otherwise). If not, your message is subject to removal and your input will not count. Also, if you object, make every attempt to be positive and constructive in your objection. For example, instead of saying, "he's clueless", say, "you need to learn the plugin commands." Do not use the application threads to bully or haze the applicants. This instruction will be monitored closely to ensure compliance.
3. Any admin of any rank can vouch or object as long as they can view the application. For example, a Telnet admin can vouch or object on a senior admin application however it won't carry the same weight as a senior admin.
4. A non-admin (OP) is not allowed comment on an admin application except to offer congratulation if the application is approved (rule 9). However, an OP can PM myself or the Executive Admins if they have specific information about the applicant that we should consider. For example, they have evidence that the applicant DDOS'd a server or the applicant was exceptionally helpful to them, etc.
5. For admin reinstatement applications, there is no need to vouch or object because they will be automatically approved unless the admin was removed for mis-conduct, However if an admin does wish to object, send a PM to the Executive Admin and owner with justification.
6. Admins will not question (or comment about) other admin vouches/objections however they can flag or send a PM to the admin, executive admin, or myself.
7. Do not use comments to suggest approval or disapproval; that's the job of the executive admin or owner. For example, don't state "auto-disapproved due to not meeting time requirements" - use "object - doesn't meet time requirements" instead.
8. If an applicant violates the rules during the application process, leave it to a senior admin, executive admin, or owner to make the correction.
9. Until the application is approved or disapproved, don't make any other comments except under rule 1 above. If the application is approved, you're allowed to make congratulatory comments including images but don't make comments to suggest the approval is wrong (use PM if needed). If an application is disapproved, it will normally be locked to prevent further comments.
10. If you are applying for an admin promotion, you may not vote or comment on another admin that is applying for the same position.